🔗 Share this article

A Denmark-based man has been convicted of uploading nude segments from copyrighted movies and television shows on the online platform Reddit.

Based on a law enforcement document obtained by media outlets, the anonymous individual shared 347 clips of explicit scenes in a subreddit he moderated, which were then viewed 4.2 million-plus times.

Danish authorities confirm he has been given a seven-month suspended jail term for copyright infringement.

Experts explain the defendant was charged under a seldom-invoked clause in Danish intellectual property legislation, with the judge finding that by removing the scenes out of their original context, the man had damaged the artists' "ethical entitlements".

He has also been found guilty of distributing more than 25 TB of copyrighted data.

From March 2022 to May 2023, the man known as "the pseudonym KlammereFyr" on Reddit uploaded sexually explicit scenes including over 100 female performers.

He distributed them in the forum he was a moderator of.

Per the Denmark's copyright protection organization The Rights Alliance (TRA), his subreddit had more than 6,000 members and users were prompted to ask for clips of specific performers.

In last year, advocates filed the case to the authorities on behalf of the impacted artists, directors and producers, which led to the subreddit being shut down.

One actress, among the actresses whose explicit content were circulated in the community, told Danish media at the time she felt there was a distinction between being seen unclothed in a film and being shown on Reddit.

The actress stated the posts amounted to "exploitation".

'An important signal'

The defendant was arrested in September 2024 and admitted guilty to the allegations last month.

In a comment after the verdict, TRA head Maria Fredenslund remarked the outcome sent an "significant" message "that infringements of creators' rights has repercussions".

The verdict is viewed as unprecedented in the country for its use of the "moral rights" clause of the Danish Copyright Act, which states an creator's work cannot be utilized in a way which violates their reputation.

Intellectual property expert Dr Alina Trapova told BBC News the case was "unusual" for its emphasis on the harm to the dignity of an performer, rather than to them financially.

How the case could affect other countries is uncertain.

But she added there may be "an increasing number of these actions" in the coming years with the growth of AI, where "the sanctity of one's creative output might be compromised with greater ease".