🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.